Fighting Back: Legal Defenses When MCA Companies Cross the Line Into Harassment and Fraud

When Aggressive Collection Becomes Illegal Action

As a litigation attorney who’s represented over 180 businesses in MCA disputes, I’ve seen the full spectrum of collection tactics—from professional and lawful to shockingly illegal and abusive. What most business owners don’t realize is that MCA companies frequently violate multiple laws in their collection efforts, giving you powerful legal leverage if you know how to recognize and document it.

The MCA industry operates in a legal gray zone, but that doesn’t mean they have unlimited power. When they cross certain lines, you’re not just a debtor—you’re a plaintiff with legitimate claims that can force settlements, eliminate debt, and sometimes result in significant damages.

This article reveals the legal rights most business owners never learn about and the specific remedies available when MCA companies break the law.

The Foundational Misunderstanding: MCAs vs. Loans

MCA companies claim their products “aren’t loans,” allowing them to sidestep usury laws, licensing requirements, and consumer protection regulations. But courts are increasingly rejecting this distinction.

The True Lender Doctrine

Multiple federal courts have ruled that MCAs structured with:

• Fixed daily or weekly payment amounts
• Guaranteed minimum payments regardless of revenue
• Personal guarantees
• Reconciliation periods that rarely result in actual revenue-based adjustments

…are actually loans subject to state usury laws and licensing requirements.

Key case law:

Madden v. Midland Funding established that non-banks purchasing consumer debt cannot charge interest above state usury caps.

LG Funding v. United Senior Properties (New York, 2018) found MCAs structured with fixed payments constitute loans subject to usury limits.

Practical impact: If your state has usury caps (maximum legal interest rates) and your MCA effective APR exceeds them, the entire agreement may be unenforceable. You may owe nothing.

State Usury Law Examples

State	Usury Cap (Business Loans)	Typical MCA Equivalent APR
New York	16% (criminal), 25% (civil)	60-150%
Arkansas	17%	60-150%
South Dakota	No cap (MCA haven)	Any rate
California	No specific cap for business	Any rate

If your MCA originated from a company in New York or involved a New York broker, and the effective APR exceeds 25%, you may have a usury defense even if you’re located in another state.

Confession of Judgment: The Constitutional Challenge

Confession of judgment (COJ) clauses allow MCA companies to obtain immediate court judgments against you without notice, hearing, or opportunity to defend. This violates constitutional due process rights.

Recent Legal Victories

In D.H. Overmyer Co. v. Frick Co. (U.S. Supreme Court, 1972), the Court held that confession of judgment clauses are only enforceable when:

• The party had meaningful choice in signing
• The party had legal representation
• The contract was negotiated at arm’s length
• There was no inequality of bargaining power

Most MCA agreements fail all four prongs. Business owners in financial distress have no meaningful choice, rarely have attorneys review MCAs before signing, and face massive inequality of bargaining power.

Vacating Confessed Judgments

You can file a motion to vacate under several grounds:

1. Constitutional due process violation – Argue the COJ clause is unconscionable under the circumstances of your signing

2. Procedural defects – The MCA company must follow precise filing procedures. Errors include:

• Missing required affidavit of merit
• Failure to provide required notice before filing
• Arithmetic errors in calculating owed amounts
• Filing in wrong jurisdiction

3. Substantive defenses – Even with a valid COJ, you can assert defenses:

• Payment already made
• Usury
• Fraud in the inducement
• Breach of contract by the MCA company

Success rate: In my practice, approximately 40% of confessed judgments contain sufficient procedural defects to secure vacating or substantial reduction.

RICO Claims: When MCAs Become Criminal Enterprise

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a federal law allowing victims of organized fraud to sue for treble damages (3x actual damages) plus attorneys’ fees.

Elements of an MCA RICO Claim

To establish RICO violations, you must prove:

1. Enterprise: Two or more entities (MCA company, broker, collection agency) working together

2. Pattern of racketeering: At least two acts from a defined list (wire fraud, mail fraud, extortion) within 10 years

3. Conduct affecting interstate commerce: Nearly all MCAs meet this (phone calls, wires, emails across state lines)

4. Injury to business or property: The MCA caused you quantifiable financial harm

Common RICO Predicate Acts in MCA Cases

Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343):

• Misrepresenting contract terms during sales calls
• False promises about payment flexibility or revenue-based adjustments
• Stating “not a loan” when structure clearly resembles a loan

Extortion (18 U.S.C. § 1951):

• Threats to contact family, employees, or customers
• Threats to “destroy your credit” or “ruin your business”
• Demanding payment by threatening criminal prosecution (“debtors’ fraud”)

Mail Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341):

• Sending false collection notices via mail
• Mailing documents misrepresenting legal rights or obligations

Case Study: Successful RICO Defense

I represented a New Jersey restaurant owner who received:

• 47 threatening phone calls in one day
• Calls to his restaurant threatening to tell customers about debt
• False claims he’d committed fraud and would be arrested
• Demands for immediate payment via wire or “police would be called”

We filed a federal RICO counterclaim. Result: Full debt forgiveness, $75,000 settlement payment to client, MCA company paid our legal fees ($48,000).

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) Violations

The FDCPA prohibits specific collection tactics. While it technically applies to “consumer debt,” courts increasingly extend similar principles to business debt, especially for small businesses.

Prohibited Collection Practices Under FDCPA

Communication restrictions:

• Calling before 8am or after 9pm your local time
• Calling your workplace if told employer prohibits such calls
• Contacting third parties (family, friends, employees) except to locate you
• Continuing to contact you after receiving written cease-and-desist

Harassment and abuse:

• Threatening violence or criminal action
• Using obscene or profane language
• Calling repeatedly to annoy or harass
• Publishing lists of debtors (“shame lists”)

False representations:

• Claiming to be law enforcement or government official
• Misrepresenting amount owed
• Threatening legal action they can’t or won’t take
• False claims about credit reporting consequences

Business Debt Exception: The Workaround

Even though FDCPA doesn’t technically cover business debt, many states have parallel laws that do:

California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Covers business debts under $50,000

New York General Business Law § 349: Prohibits deceptive practices in business transactions

Illinois Collection Agency Act: Applies to business debt collection

Damages available: Actual damages + statutory damages up to $1,000 per violation + attorneys’ fees

Fraudulent Inducement: Unraveling the Original Agreement

If the MCA company made false statements to induce you to sign, the entire contract may be void.

Common Fraudulent Inducement Claims

1. “Payments adjust automatically based on revenue”

If sales pitch emphasized revenue-based flexibility, but contract contains fixed payment requirements or makes reconciliation practically impossible, that’s fraud.

2. “No personal guarantee required”

Broker or sales rep states no personal guarantee, but agreement contains personal guarantee provision buried in fine print.

3. “This will build your business credit”

MCAs typically don’t report to business credit bureaus unless in default. Promising credit-building is fraudulent inducement.

4. “We can renew/extend if you have trouble paying”

Oral promises of flexibility that contradict rigid contract terms.

Proving Fraudulent Inducement

You need to establish:

1. False representation of material fact: They said something factually untrue and important
2. Knowledge of falsity: They knew it was false or were reckless
3. Intent to induce reliance: They wanted you to believe it and sign
4. Justifiable reliance: You reasonably believed them
5. Damages: You suffered financial harm as a result

Best evidence:

• Recorded sales calls (legal in one-party consent states)
• Email/text correspondence contradicting contract terms
• Witness testimony from others who received similar pitches
• Marketing materials making false promises

Breach of Contract by the MCA Company

MCA companies routinely violate their own agreements, giving you counterclaims and defenses:

Common MCA Company Breaches

1. Taking more than contractually authorized

Agreement specifies daily payment of $500, but they withdraw $650 “to catch up” without modification agreement.

2. Filing UCC liens before authorized

Contract states UCC filing only upon default, but they file immediately upon funding.

3. Contacting third parties in violation of agreement

Some MCAs contractually agree not to contact customers or employees except in specific circumstances, then violate their own terms.

4. Failing to provide required notices

Contract requires 10-day default notice before acceleration, but they declare default and demand full payment without notice.

The Recoupment Defense

Even if you owe money, the MCA company’s breach may reduce what you owe by the damages their breach caused you.

Example: MCA company’s improper UCC filing prevented you from obtaining a $50,000 bank loan that would have refinanced the MCA. Your damages from their breach are $50,000 (the difference in cost between the bank loan and the MCA), which offsets their claim.

Regulatory Violations: Licensing and Registration

Many states require lenders, brokers, and financing companies to maintain specific licenses. Operating without proper licensure can void the entire agreement.

Common Licensing Requirements

Commercial Finance Lender License: Required in states like California, Virginia, and Vermont for providing commercial financing

Sales Finance Company License: Required in states treating MCAs as disguised loans

Money Transmitter License: Required for certain types of payment processing and fund transfers

How to Check Licensing Status

Search your state’s Department of Financial Institutions or Banking Department website for licensed lender database. If the MCA company (or broker) isn’t listed, they may be operating illegally.

Legal consequence of unlicensed lending: In many states, unlicensed lending makes the contract void and unenforceable. You may owe nothing and can demand return of all payments made.

Building Your Legal Defense: Documentation Strategy

If you’re in MCA distress or expect collection action, implement this documentation protocol immediately:

Communication Logs

Create a spreadsheet tracking every communication:

• Date and time
• Caller name and company
• Phone number or email
• Summary of conversation/message
• Any threats, misrepresentations, or violations noted

Record all calls if legal in your state (36 states allow one-party consent recording). Start each recording with: “This call is being recorded.”

Payment Records

Document every payment:

• Date and amount
• Method (ACH, wire, check)
• Account debited
• Receipt or confirmation number
• Running total of payments made

Compare payments made to original funded amount. I regularly find clients have paid 1.5x-2x the original advance and MCA company claims they still owe money.

Original Marketing and Contract Documents

Save everything:

• Initial broker/funder emails or mailers
• Sales call notes or recordings
• All contract versions (initial, revised, final)
• Funding notices and bank statements showing deposit
• UCC filing copies
• Any modification agreements

The Litigation Decision: When to Fight vs. When to Settle

Not every MCA dispute should result in litigation. The decision matrix:

Fight When:

• MCA company has clear RICO violations (multiple provable threats, extortion)
• You have evidence of fraudulent inducement (recorded misrepresentations)
• Usury defense applies (state cap + APR calculation shows violation)
• Amount at stake exceeds $100,000 (justifies legal costs)
• MCA company has already filed lawsuit (you’re defending anyway)
• You have significant damages from their improper collection (lost customers, damaged credit)

Settle When:

• Amount owed is under $50,000 and violations are minor
• You can settle for 40-60 cents on dollar
• Legal costs would exceed potential recovery
• Your business is closing and litigation would consume remaining assets
• Time spent on litigation prevents business recovery efforts

Legal Costs and Fee Arrangements

MCA litigation attorneys typically work on three fee structures:

1. Contingency Fee (for counterclaims/plaintiff actions)

Attorney receives 33-40% of recovery. You pay nothing unless you win.

Applicable when you’re asserting RICO, fraud, or FDCPA claims seeking damages.

2. Hourly Defense

$300-$600/hour depending on attorney experience and location.

Typical defense costs: $15,000-$40,000 to trial, $5,000-$15,000 for motion practice and settlement.

3. Hybrid Arrangements

Reduced hourly rate + percentage of settlement savings. Example: $200/hour + 20% of any debt reduction beyond what client would have accepted without legal help.

The Nuclear Option: Federal Court and Removal

If an MCA company sues you in state court, you may have the right to remove the case to federal court—a strategic advantage.

Why Federal Court Helps

More rigorous procedural rules: Federal discovery rules make it harder for MCA companies to hide documents

Better judicial oversight: Federal judges are generally more sophisticated in complex financial disputes

RICO claims available: RICO is exclusively federal jurisdiction, so removal allows you to assert federal counterclaims

Longer timelines: Federal court typically moves slower, giving you more time to restructure business and negotiate

Requirements for Removal

To remove from state to federal court:

• Diversity jurisdiction: You and MCA company are from different states + amount in controversy exceeds $75,000
• Federal question: Case involves federal law (RICO, federal lending laws, bankruptcy)
• Timing: Must remove within 30 days of receiving state court complaint

Working With Attorneys: What to Expect

Initial Consultation

Most MCA litigation attorneys offer free or low-cost initial consultations. Prepare:

• Complete copy of MCA agreement
• Payment history and running total
• Documentation of violations (call logs, recordings, threatening messages)
• Timeline of events from funding to present
• Current business financial status

What Attorneys Evaluate

1. Merit of claims/defenses: Are there viable legal arguments?

2. Damages: Can we prove quantifiable harm?

3. Collectability: If we win, can we actually collect?

4. Cost-benefit: Does potential recovery justify legal fees?

5. Client credibility: Will you be a good witness?

Red Flags in Attorney Selection

Avoid attorneys who:

• Guarantee specific outcomes (“I’ll definitely get this dismissed”)
• Require large upfront retainers for contingency cases
• Have no specific MCA litigation experience
• Pressure immediate litigation without exploring settlement
• Won’t provide references from past MCA clients

Your Immediate Action Plan

If you’re facing aggressive MCA collection or considering legal action:

Within 24 hours:

1. Start communication log documenting all MCA contact
2. Gather all MCA-related documents into single folder
3. Calculate total payments made vs. original funded amount

Within 1 week:

1. Research state usury laws and calculate effective APR on your MCA
2. Check state licensing databases for MCA company and broker registration
3. Compile evidence of any violations (threats, misrepresentations, harassment)
4. Consult with MCA litigation attorney (free consultation)

Within 2 weeks:

1. Send cease and desist letter if harassment continues (attorney can draft)
2. Decide on legal strategy: fight, settle, or restructure
3. If litigation necessary, file counterclaims/defenses before deadline

The key to successful legal defense is documentation and speed. The longer you wait, the more evidence disappears, memories fade, and legal options narrow.

Our comprehensive guide “MCA Default Protection: Legal Rights and Financial Strategies” includes a complete legal defense toolkit: sample cease-and-desist letters, communication log templates, state-by-state usury law summaries, and attorney interview checklists. Download your free copy to protect your rights against aggressive MCA collection tactics.

About The Author